Rooney’s Return puts England through in first

19 06 2012

England had appeared to be doing just fine without Wayne Rooney in the side: in fact they’d played seven games without him, losing only once and amassing a 71% win ratio. When he came on for a brief cameo against Belgium the game had already been won. The Three Lions’ only loss in his absence was a 3-2 friendly defeat to the Netherlands back when Stuart Pearce was wishfully auditioning for the summer work experience job kicking about at England’s national team.

However, his return could not have been more emphasized: from a rousing Nike video, which claimed his “time was now,” presumably forgetting the 15 players that had so far pulled on the shirt for England in Group D, drawing 1-1 to Matt Le Tissier’s pre-tournament favourites France and turning around a 2-1 deficit to beat Sweden 3-2 in a Walcott-inspired performance, to the Twitterhype and global media’s coverage of  ”England’s Pele.”


England’s real savior thus far?

Ukraine’s hopes were also being hinged on the presence of one man: Andriy Shevchenko. In the 24-hour build-up to the game, the former AC Milan striker was being touted as “50-50″ to make the game; alternatively one could take Bayern Munich midfielder Anatoliy Tymoshchuk’s view who thought it was more 75:25 in favour of his teammate playing, stating that “Shevchenko is a little bit injured.”

Either way, let’s not allow for Ukraine’s “biggest game in the country’s history,” as former Liverpool masterstroke Andriy Voronin put it, and England’s potential place in the quarter-finals revolve around two men………..oh.

There was, however, another game set to play out as the subplot to England’s qualification from Group D: France versus Sweden; top against bottom; Nasri’s ego taking on Ibrahimovic’s ego. The French only needed a point to go through, but would then risk England leapfrogging them into first place if they could beat Ukraine. With European Champions Spain awaiting the runners-up of Group D, the tussle for qualification was also a battle for the top spot.

From the off Ukraine took the impetus to take the upper hand and theie heir apparent Andriy Yarmolenko was looking immediately dangerous, and it was only a string of blocks, an agile Joe Hart and the occasional stray Ukrainian ball that kept the scores level early. The home side, co-hosts Ukraine, playing in the Donbass Arena, Donetsk really did look likely to strike first, despite head coach Oleh Blokhin doing all he could pregame to build England up as the favourites.

The Three Lions certainly weren’t playing like the favourites and despite Roy Hodgson’s so far squeaky clean relationship with the media, his words from the press conference prior to the game were not representative of the first half showing: “I’ve never really understood how you play for a draw,” he told the room, within 24-hours of England seemingly playing out the first half for a draw, “to play for a draw is dangerous if it means allowing the opponents to have the initiative and you just try and camp somewhere deep in your half.” Hodgson had got that bit right and it summed up the first forty-five minutes perfectly: England were setting up camp deep and Ukraine looked dangerous.

“When you do that, you’re inviting them into your penalty area all the time and, as we saw the other night [against Sweden], it doesn’t have to be a good ball in that costs you a goal.” Therefore, it was no surprise that the best chance of the first half fell to Yarmolenko. Just before the half-hour mark, the Dynamo Kyiv forward received the ball in the right hand side of the box, cut inside onto his favoured left foot and bent a shot towards the bottom left hand corner of the goal, just to be denied by Joe Hart.

In contrast, England’s best chance of the first half wasn’t even on target: John Terry had the ball wide right on the edge of England’s half, hit a deep cross-field ball into the far-left corner, which Ashley Young deftly controlled, before cutting back onto his stronger right foot and whipping in a Rooney-bound cross. However the returning England striker failed to execute his jump in timing with the delivery and his header was put well wide. It was symbolic of his first half – nearly, but not quite.

Fortunately, for England, Sweden were holding France to a nil-all game, meaning, according to the BBC, England would go through in first place with 4 points and therefore face 2006 World Cup winners Italy, whose only victory so far has come against Ireland in their last group fixture. However, with Sweden showing how quickly they tire in the second-half of games so far this tournament, the score was not expected to stay the same there. As it was, they were creating twice as many chances as Sweden: but then again, so had Ukraine.

The restart saw a swift change to proceedings: England upped the ante, had a changed dynamic and were looking sharp in possession. Whether it was a conscious decision on behalf of Roy Hodgson or England were purely quick to pounce on some slovenly play by Ukraine was yet to become clear. However, with just under a minute of the second half underway England had earned themselves a corner as a result of a poorly dealt with Ashley Cole free-kick.

Steven Gerrard took the corner, playing a deep and looping ball towards the penalty spot, which was headed clear by Rakitskiy; but it was not a header with great distance and Gerrard received the ball back on the wing, produced a step over, forced his way past his man and drove in a low and powerful cross, which took one deflection, then another, excaping the ‘keeper’s grasp, and found Wayne Rooney at the back post who nodded home into an unguarded net. England had taken the lead and looked dominant for a long while after.

Meanwhile, in the Sweden versus France encounter, Zlatan Ibrahimovic had superbly volleyed in a Seb Larsson cross to send the Swedes into an unexpected led, which meant England were now leading the group by three clear points. Despite their lead Sweden were 3rd, leaving Ukraine now in bottom, having topped the group after round one.

However, with just over an hour played, Ukraine looked to have leveled: Marko Devic received a through ball, in which seemed to be an offside position, pushed past his man, Terry, and saw his shot pass Joe Hart and look destined for the goal. Yet, an acrobatic and determined John Terry had tracked the ball’s path and hooked it off of the line and clear for England to break.

Ukraine were in celebration, but England were on the attack: within a minute of striking a shot goal bound, Devic’s side looked threatened. Scott Parker advanced down the left flank with the ball, but was heaved to the floor by Tymoschuck. The Bayern midfielder was booked and the cameras panned to a replay of Ukraine’s effort, which seemed to have crossed the line, but also showed Devic to be in an offside position. Congratulations UEFA and your 26 assistant community support officer referees.

Ukraine continued to dominate possession, but the best chances of the second half really were England’s. Ashley Cole came close to scoring his first international goal, but a quick reflex palm away from Pyatov kept the Ukrainian deficit at one. Ukraine, perhaps buoyed by the news that France were trailing, were looking for an equaliser.

Andriy Shevchenko came on for Devic with 70 minutes played and the atmosphere was raised by a tangible level: as he jogged his way on to the pitch, for probably the last time as a Ukrainian international, the cameras panned to the crowd and man, woman and child alike were afoot and in applause. One particular boy, no older than eight, was beaming from ear to ear, chanting his hero’s name. But, it was Konoplienka who nearly handed his nation a lifeline, with his thunderous effort to hot for Hart to handle and only prevented from being turned in from close range by a spirited Joleon Lescott, who reacted quickest to the loose ball.

Hodgson rang his three changes as the game progressed through it’s last stages, bringing on Walcott for Milner, Carroll for Welbeck and Chamberlain for Rooney, but neither were required to make the impact Walcott had done against Sweden. The score remained as it was, 1-0, and shortly before the referee blew a halt to proceedings, news filtered through that Larsson had doubled Sweden’s lead.

Now, England face Group C runners-up Italy on Sunday in the last quarter-final, whilst 4-point France will face World and European Champions Spain on Saturday.

So far so good for England, but will their compact and defensively focused approach come undone against sterner opposition. Sunday will have the answer.





How Chelsea can overturn Napoli and fly the flag for England, alone

1 03 2012

The first leg wasn’t a blazing beacon for English football, be it Arsenal’s version of a representation of the quality of football in the Premier League, capitulating to the eldest team in a European top flight, or Chelsea’s incompetence in the absence of dethroned ex-England captain John Terry, surrendering an early 1-0 lead to lose by two.

Essentially, the so-called boring league of the Serie A dissembled England’s last two hopes of a Champions League trophy with some of the best attacking football that this year’s competition had seen. Yet, Chelsea can still progress and expectations will suitably match Andre Villas-Boas’ desire to keep his job: unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Arsenal, whose home leg will now serve no further purpose than fuelling the anti-Wenger brigade.

John Terry’s absence will undoubtedly be felt. However, since Chelsea’s Italian job, one thing has changed: before their 3-0 victory over Cahill’s former side Bolton, Chelsea were without a clean sheet in a Terry-less side so far this season, but, a Blues side with only a 27% clean sheet ratio this season, kept one without their captain last weekend.

Then, fashionable Stuart Pearce’s England, minus an injured John Terry, gave his new teammate Gary Cahill a full 90-minute run-out, which at 85’ was duly reward as he fluidly turned in the box to fire past Martin Stekelenburg. At the moment, every minute for Gary Cahill is valuable and a full match against strong opposition will serve him well. However, Chelsea’s right to be jubilant with their centre-back’s display, nearly putting England 1-0 up within the first ten minutes, may’ve been jaded by the fact that man-of-the-match Daniel Sturridge, whose constant hindrance to the Dutch back four kept England looking dangerous, despite spearhead Welbeck’s anonymity, went off injured in the closing stages.

Yet, Sturridge’s performance, only his second in an England shirt, has inspired belief that England’s strike force can be potent without Rooney, and possibly Bent, for the majority of the group stage. The news can only, itself, inspire Sturridge to continue to perform to the high standard he has all campaign in the blue of Chelsea and build on his nine Premier League goals and four assists.

In Terry’s absence, two players have rose to the occasion, domestically and internationally, and with Ashley Cole potentially benefitting from 90 minutes on the bench whilst the more youthful Chelsea duo ran themselves into the ground, their English stars may well have been the best prepared, whilst hitting the best of form, ahead of their second leg. With the ability to secure three more victories on the bounce against beatable opposition in West Brom, Birmingham and Stoke, Chelsea could go into the second leg firing on all cylinders.

The challenge is on the day and it is a challenge that can be won only by their manager.

Firstly, Chelsea go into the second leg, which in on March 14th, with an 100% record on home soil so far in the competition. Furthermore, not only were all nine points collected at Stamford Bridge, but they were collected without conceding a goal and hitting ten of their own in the process – an average of 3.33 per game, against Bayern Leverkusen, Genk and Valencia.

With such an impressive run sparked up at home in Europe, Chelsea should take full confidence into the game and it should be transcribed in their tactics, which will only be emphasized by the fact that they have to overhaul a two-goal deficit. The Blues will be fully expected to field a 4-3-3/4-5-1 formation at Stamford Bridge, with two wingers off of a lone forward leading the line. As well as naturally suiting Chelsea, it, if correctly executed by Andre-Villas Boas who does have previous experience against Napoli from his time at Inter, can stifle Napoli’s attacking triumvirate by destabilising their three-man back line.

Napoli’s favoured 3-4-3 approach, with Maggio and Zuniga operating as attacking wing backs, was the perfect choice on the night of the first leg. Chelsea played into the Italian’s hands, failing to make a three-man defence advantageous to them: instead of providing Napoli with a numerical paradox at the back, by playing the 4-3-3, essentially forcing redundancy of one of Napoli’s back three – as the lone striker requires just one marker and one cover – Chelsea adopted a 4-2-3-1, which, with an aimlessly wandering Malouda, often became a 4-4-1-1.

At home, The Blues should have the confidence to play a 4-3-3 – especially considering the lessons learned in the first leg.

Then comes the destabilizing of Napoli’s attacking triumvirate: six teams have adopted a three-man defence in Serie A so far this season, in order to play with three strikers – not two wingers and a lone striker, three strikers. The problem with the formation is finding wing backs enduring enough to operate both defensively and on the attack whilst playing on the flanks: yet, in Maggio, Dossena and Zuniga, Napoli have three durable wingers.

This affords the Italians three strikers and with Terry missing and Ivanovic likely to play right back, despite questionably unable to cope with Cavani and Lavezzi as a partnership within the triumvirate, David Luiz and Cahill are likely to partner each other at centre-back much like the first leg.

What must differ from the first leg is Michael Essien. If Chelsea are to overturn the deficit, The Bison may well be the necessary component.

As well as the tactical and strategic approach to the day, Chelsea can not only learn from themselves, but from Andre Villas-Boas’ previous experience of Napoli, as aforementioned, and Manchester City’s 1-1 draw on their Champions league debut.

Similarly to most teams that have taken on Napoli in recent years, Inter struggled at Stadio San Paolo. But, at the San Siro, Mourinho’s men were able to come out victorious with a 2-1 win. Under Jose Mourinho, Villas-Boas was the meticulously critical opposition observer, taking four days to compile each scout report and in the case of playing at home, Inter benefitted from such in-depth analysis and took all three points. Chelsea may’ve suitably prepared for the first leg, but Terry’s last minute pull out would’ve effected preparations, despite an expected Plan B, and the used personnel was seemingly not the correct personnel on the night.

Furthermore, Chelsea can learn from the City game, which finished a score draw at one a piece. Man City laid an early siege at Napoli’s door but were not able to take advantage and the further the game went on, with the score still level, Napoli’s endurance shone through and, happy to sit deep for the majority of the game, a quick breakaway during another intense City attack was enough to put them into a short-lived lead.

Inter’s 2-1 win against Napoli during AVB’s time there, came thanks to two early goals. With City threatening to do the same, but ultimately failing, all signs point to Chelsea attacking from the off and chucking caution to the wind, along with patience. In the group stages, Chelsea took the most shots and an equally penetrating performance will be needed. If Chelsea can take a lead, they should take confidence in changing from a 4-3-3 to a 4-5-1, continuing to play with a lone striker, thus exploiting Napoli’s tactics.

Chelsea are capable of overturning this two-goal deficit: the question – possibly answered as soon as Villas-Boas announces his team sheet – is, is their manager capable?

Written by Jordan Florit for www.maycauseoffence.com/ For more articles visit my website or my Twitter @JordanFlorit